|
Fetal and
Infant Mortality Review (FIMR): A Tool That Communities
Can Use To Identify and Address Issues Related To
Disparity in Infant Health Outcomes.
INTRODUCTION
Unique among all health outcomes, infant mortality has always been viewed as a
sentinel event that serves as a measure of a community’s health as well as its
social and economic well being. It is also a measure of the organization and
abilities of a community’s health and human services resources. Infant
mortality is associated with a variety of factors including quality of and
access to pregnancy and pediatric health care, socioeconomic conditions,
family stressors, the strength of high risk safety nets, the quality of
community resources and the cultural competence of local service systems.
In 2002, the United States infant mortality rate increased to 6.95 deaths per
1,000 live births. This unexpected increase in infant mortality was the first
in more than 40 years. In 2003, the infant mortality decreased to 6.84 deaths
per 1,000 live births, the same rate seen in 2001, although the decrease was
not statistically significant. (1)
When examined for race and ethnicity, infant mortality rates vary
significantly. The African American community experiences the greatest
disparity in infant mortality with the rate, at least, double that for white
infants. (2) Native American infant deaths due to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
(SIDS) are the highest in the nation - 2.4 times higher than non Hispanic
white infants. (3)
According to the March of Dimes, the percentage of deaths occurring to infants
born premature or with low birth weight increased 9% between 1995 and 2003.
(4) The rate of preterm births among African American women is also about 4
times higher than non Hispanic white women. The low birth weight rate for
Puerto Rican women was more than twice the rate for non Hispanic white women.
(5)
Very little is actually known about what underlies these racial and ethnic
health differences in low birth weight and infant mortality. (7) However, in
the year 2000, one out of three Americans was African American, Latino, Middle
Eastern or Asian/Pacific Islander. (7) This means that a growing number of
women, infants and families may face adverse outcomes of pregnancy. (8)
Today, community-based Fetal and Infant Mortality Review (FIMR) is an
action-oriented continuous quality improvement process that is playing a
significant role in building community partnerships, understanding community
issues associated with heath disparity and developing culturally sensitive
actions to address disparities.
What is FIMR?
The overall goal of Fetal and Infant Mortality review is to enhance the health
and well-being of women, infants and families by improving the community
resources and service delivery systems available to them. Through FIMR, key
members of the community come together to review information from individual
fetal and infant deaths. The purpose of these reviews is to identify the
factors associated with these deaths, determine if they represent system
problems that require change, develop recommendations for change and assist in
the implementation of change. (9)
The recent findings of the national evaluation of FIMR indicate that this
process is an evidence-based, effective perinatal systems initiative. The
evaluation also documents that local health departments sponsoring FIMR
compared with those without FIMR were more likely to report six improved core
public health functions (10):
v
Data collection and analysis,
v
Client services and access,
v
Quality improvement for systems
of care,
v
Partnerships and collaboration,
v
Population advocacy and policy
development and
v
Enhancement of the labor force.
How FIMR Can Help
Three components of the FIMR process are especially valuable in discovering
and addressing community factors related to infant health disparities: (11)
(12)
1.
The diverse coalition/community partnership building component
of the process,
2.
Inclusion of the voice of local families who have lost their
babies, and
3.
FIMR actions based on decisions pertaining to the whole
community and the families who live there
1. The coalition/community partnership
building component of the process.
A first step in addressing issues related to health disparities must be for
each community to develop a greater understanding and appreciation of its
diversity.
FIMR includes a community coalition/ partnership building component that can
bring together the array of ethnic and cultural views in the community and
promote a climate of respect and understanding.
Successful FIMR projects include a wide variety of culturally diverse partners
in their activities. Typically FIMR engages about 30 to 50 active community
members including policymakers, representatives of organizations, families and
consumer advocacy groups.
Bringing all these partners together to address community issues is a success
story in itself. FIMR meetings and discussions about the health and well being
of women, infants and families provide a real opportunity for community
members to grow in understanding and appreciation of cultural beliefs and
behaviors that differ from their own.
“During the past three years,
the FIMR team [members] have grappled with many difficult issues. Racial and
ethnic sensitivity of all team members has increased.
We believe the CRTs have worked
well together and have all grown in
understanding of others who are
not of their sex, race, ethnicity or profession”
Mary Hibbard, MD
Former Commission of Health, Suffolk County,
N.Y.
2. Inclusion of the voice of local families
who have lost their babies.
The FIMR process includes a home interview with the mother who has suffered a
loss. The mother describes health and human services and other resources she
received or wished for, her cultural view of the experiences surrounding her
pregnancy and the birth and death of her child, background information about
her relationship with the father and other support persons, physical/emotional
stressors and grief reaction to the loss. For many mothers, this may be the
first and, perhaps, only opportunity to talk to another person about the loss
of her infant.
The home interviewer then conveys the mother’s story to the FIMR members.
Thus, the home interview lets the true voice of each bereaved parent speak to
the community at large. FIMR projects find that this home interview almost
always provides the most valuable information in the review. It is extremely
important to their understanding of whether or not services and community
resources are available, accessible and culturally appropriate for the
community. Findings in a pertinent study (13) support this view, "Intervention
programs that listen to the voice of the community and especially the women
themselves ... may be the most successful in improving pregnancy outcomes...."
FIMR teams can also more readily identify issues of racism and other forms of
discrimination in service delivery systems through the interview and can
effectively begin to address them.
"Maternal interviews give a
voice to the disenfranchised in my community, those
without clout or power. FIMR
provides a rare opportunity for the ‘providers’ in a community to hear from
the ‘consumers’.”
Patt Young, FIMR Interviewer, Alameda/Contra
Costa Counties, CA
3. FIMR actions/Interventions based on the
documented needs of the community and the families who live there.
FIMR is an action oriented, community process leading to creative and
culturally sensitive interventions. The actions result from the decisions of
broad - based, culturally-diverse FIMR coalition and partnerships. Thus, they
represent the collective wisdom and expertise of the entire community, not
just a part. The actions grow out of a broad-based, culturally-diverse
perspective. They are crafted to address the needs of many local families, not
just a few.
“The process that brings
together diverse people to learn from the story of a
family that experienced a fetal
or infant loss helps awaken both commitment
and creativity. The stories
illustrate community needs that are clearly concrete,
local and significant, while the
interaction among diverse community
participants generates ideas for
action that might lie beyond the imagination
and power of an individual
provider or agency.”
Seth Foldy, MD, Former Commissioner of
Health, Milwaukee WI
Conclusion
FIMR is an evidence-based perinatal systems initiative that is being
implemented to understand and intervene to correct factors that may contribute
to disparity in infant health outcomes. Specifically, FIMR can: 1) bring
diverse community members together to participate in a process that provides
an opportunity for them to grow in understanding of others who are not of
their age, sex, race, ethnicity or occupation; and 2) develop local
interventions from FIMR reviews that are culturally sensitive, community
specific and family-oriented. FIMR empowers the community to develop creative,
culturally relevant maternal, infant and family health policies, programs and
resources.
"Gradually through our FIMR
reviews, we have come to realize that infant mortality is not an isolated
problem, but an indicator of deeper issues and stresses in our community:
poverty, social isolation, divisions of race and class and barriers to equal
access to health care. We knew we must begin to focus on those broader
issues."
Karen Papachoudo, FIMR
coordinator, Aiken, South Carolina
References
1.
Infant Mortality Statistics from the 2003 Period Linked Birth/Death
Data Set. NVSR. Volume 56 Number 16, May 3 2006.
2.
Ibid.
3.
Ibid
4.
March of Dimes. US Infant Mortality Rate Fails to Improve. Online 2006:
http://www.marchofdimes.com/about us/15796_19840.asp.
5.
Infant Mortality Statistics from the 2003 Period Linked Birth/Death
Data Set. NVSR. Volume 56 Number 16, May 3 2006.
6. Berglas N, Lim JJ. Racial
and ethnic disparities in maternal and child health. Washington, DC:
National Center for Education in maternal and Child Health, pp 2- 3
7. Day JC. Population
projections of the United States. by age, sex, race and Hispanic origins:
1995 to 2050. United States Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports.
Washington, DC: government printing Office, pp25 - 1130
8. Berglas N, Lim JJ. Racial
and ethnic disparities in maternal and child health. Washington, DC:
National Center for Education in maternal and Child Health, pp 2-3
9. For more information
about the FIMR process, refer to Buckley KA, Koontz MA and Casey S. Fetal
and infant mortality reciew manual: a guide for communities. Washington,
DC: National Fetal and Infant Mortality Review. American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1988.
10. Adam Allston et al. The
Evaluation of FIMR programs nationwide: early findings. Johns Hopkins
University, Bloomberg School of Public Health Online 2006 at www.med.jhu.edu/wchpc.
11. Henry JK. Eliminating
health inequities: national goals and developing programs. J Obstet Gynecol
Neonatal Nurs, Sept-Oct 2001;30 (5)523-8
12. For further information about the FIMR process and disparities, refer to
the NFIMR Bulletin. FIMR: A tool communities can use to identify and address
issues related to health disparities in infant outcome. American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists. May 2001
13. Mullings L et al. Qualitative methodologies and community participation in
examining reproductive experiences: the Harlem Birth Right project. Maternal
and Child Health Journal, June 2001; 5 (2):67-140
Prepared by the National Fetal and Infant Mortality Review Program (NFIMR) - a
collaborative effort between the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists and the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and
Services Administration. Support was provided by Project U08MC00136 from the
Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Title V, Social Security Act), Health
Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human
Services.
|